Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — ft3/ms to cL/s
Convert Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per millisecond = 2,831,684.659 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 28.31684659 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds
Cubic foot per Millisecond and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = cubic feet per millisecond × 2831684.6592
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per millisecond-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 2831684.6592.
Simple example
1 ft3/ms × 2831684.659 = 2,831,684.659 cL/s
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 2,831,684.659 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/ms × 2831684.659 = 169,901,079.6 cL/s
60 cubic feet per millisecond = 169,901,079.6 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/ms | 283,168.4659 cL/s |
| 1 ft3/ms | 2,831,684.659 cL/s |
| 10 ft3/ms | 28,316,846.59 cL/s |
| 60 ft3/ms | 169,901,079.6 cL/s |
| 100 ft3/ms | 283,168,465.9 cL/s |
| 1,000 ft3/ms | 2,831,684,659 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Millisecond
1 cL/s × 3.531467e-7 = 3.531467e-7 ft3/ms
1 centiliter per seconds = 3.531467e-7 cubic feet per millisecond.
cubic feet per millisecond = centiliter per seconds × 3.531467e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per millisecond?
1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 2,831,684.659 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per millisecond value by 2831684.659. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to cubic foot per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 3.531467e-7 cubic feet per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per millisecond to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per millisecond and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2831684.659 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.