Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial gallon per Weeks Converter — cL/s to imp gal/wk
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Imperial gallon per Weeks (imp gal/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 1,330.374014 imperial gallon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial gallon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 7.5166832e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial gallon per Weeks
Centiliter per Seconds and Imperial gallon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial gallon per weeks = centiliter per seconds × 1330.37401371
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 imperial gallon per weeks equals 7.516683e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-imperial gallon per weeks factor of 1330.37401371.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 1330.374014 = 1,330.374014 imp gal/wk
1 centiliter per seconds = 1,330.374014 imperial gallon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 1330.374014 = 79,822.44082 imp gal/wk
60 centiliter per seconds = 79,822.44082 imperial gallon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Imperial gallon per Weeks (imp gal/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 133.0374014 imp gal/wk |
| 1 cL/s | 1,330.374014 imp gal/wk |
| 10 cL/s | 13,303.74014 imp gal/wk |
| 60 cL/s | 79,822.44082 imp gal/wk |
| 100 cL/s | 133,037.4014 imp gal/wk |
| 1,000 cL/s | 1,330,374.014 imp gal/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial gallon per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds
1 imp gal/wk × 0.0007516683201 = 0.0007516683 cL/s
1 imperial gallon per weeks = 0.0007516683 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = imperial gallon per weeks × 0.000751668320106
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial gallon per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Weeks (imp gal/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial gallon per weeks are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 1,330.374014 imperial gallon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to imperial gallon per weeks?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 1330.374014. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial gallon per weeks back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial gallon per weeks equals 0.0007516683 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial gallon per weeks?
Imperial gallon per Weeks (imp gal/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to imperial gallon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and imperial gallon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1330.374014 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.