Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial gallon per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — imp gal/wk to cL/s
Convert Imperial gallon per Weeks (imp gal/wk) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial gallon per weeks = 0.0007516683 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial gallon per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.5166832e-9 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial gallon per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds
Imperial gallon per Weeks and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = imperial gallon per weeks × 0.000751668320106
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial gallon per weeks equals 7.516683e-9 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial gallon per weeks-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 0.000751668320106.
Simple example
1 imp gal/wk × 0.0007516683201 = 0.0007516683 cL/s
1 imperial gallon per weeks = 0.0007516683 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 imp gal/wk × 0.0007516683201 = 0.0451000992 cL/s
60 imperial gallon per weeks = 0.0451000992 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Imperial gallon per Weeks (imp gal/wk) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp gal/wk | 0.0000751668 cL/s |
| 1 imp gal/wk | 0.0007516683 cL/s |
| 10 imp gal/wk | 0.0075166832 cL/s |
| 60 imp gal/wk | 0.0451000992 cL/s |
| 100 imp gal/wk | 0.075166832 cL/s |
| 1,000 imp gal/wk | 0.7516683201 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial gallon per Weeks
0.0007516683 cL/s × 1330.374014 = 0.9999999733 imp gal/wk
0.0007516683 centiliter per seconds = 0.9999999733 imperial gallon per weeks.
imperial gallon per weeks = centiliter per seconds × 1330.37401371
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial gallon per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Weeks (imp gal/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 imperial gallon per weeks?
1 imperial gallon per weeks equals 0.0007516683 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial gallon per weeks to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the imperial gallon per weeks value by 0.0007516683201. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to imperial gallon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 1,330.374014 imperial gallon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial gallon per weeks?
Imperial gallon per Weeks (imp gal/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial gallon per weeks to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial gallon per weeks and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0007516683201 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.