Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — cL/s to imp qt/wk
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 5,321.496055 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks
Centiliter per Seconds and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = centiliter per seconds × 5321.49605485
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 5321.49605485.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 5321.496055 = 5,321.496055 imp qt/wk
1 centiliter per seconds = 5,321.496055 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 5321.496055 = 319,289.7633 imp qt/wk
60 centiliter per seconds = 319,289.7633 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 532.1496055 imp qt/wk |
| 1 cL/s | 5,321.496055 imp qt/wk |
| 10 cL/s | 53,214.96055 imp qt/wk |
| 60 cL/s | 319,289.7633 imp qt/wk |
| 100 cL/s | 532,149.6055 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 cL/s | 5,321,496.055 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds
1 imp qt/wk × 0.00018791708 = 0.0001879171 cL/s
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0001879171 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = imperial quart per weeks × 0.000187917080026
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 5,321.496055 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 5321.496055. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0001879171 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5321.496055 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.