Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — imp qt/wk to cL/s
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0001879171 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds
Imperial quart per Weeks and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = imperial quart per weeks × 0.000187917080026
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 0.000187917080026.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 0.00018791708 = 0.0001879171 cL/s
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0001879171 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 0.00018791708 = 0.0112750248 cL/s
60 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0112750248 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 0.0000187917 cL/s |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 0.0001879171 cL/s |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 0.0018791708 cL/s |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 0.0112750248 cL/s |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 0.018791708 cL/s |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 0.18791708 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks
0.0001879171 cL/s × 5321.496055 = 1.000000106 imp qt/wk
0.0001879171 centiliter per seconds = 1.000000106 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = centiliter per seconds × 5321.49605485
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0001879171 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 0.00018791708. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 5,321.496055 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00018791708 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.