Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds Converter — cL/wk to metric tsp/s
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000033069 metric teaspoon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 5e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds
Centiliter per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per seconds = centiliter per weeks × 0.00000330687830688
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 0.000005 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per seconds factor of 0.00000330687830688.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.000003306878307 = 0.0000033069 metric tsp/s
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000033069 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.000003306878307 = 0.0001984127 metric tsp/s
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.0001984127 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 3.306878e-7 metric tsp/s |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.0000033069 metric tsp/s |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.0000330688 metric tsp/s |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.0001984127 metric tsp/s |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.0003306878 metric tsp/s |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.0033068783 metric tsp/s |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks
0.0000033069 metric tsp/s × 302400 = 1.00000656 cL/wk
0.0000033069 metric teaspoon per seconds = 1.00000656 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = metric teaspoon per seconds × 302400
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per seconds are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0000033069 metric teaspoon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.000003306878307. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per seconds back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 302,400 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per seconds?
Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and metric teaspoon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003306878307 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.