Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks Converter — metric tsp/s to cL/wk
Convert Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) to Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per seconds = 302,400 centiliter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 5e-6 / 1.65343915e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks
Metric teaspoon per Seconds and Centiliter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per weeks = metric teaspoon per seconds × 302400
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 0.000005 base units, and 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per seconds-to-centiliter per weeks factor of 302400.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/s × 302400 = 302,400 cL/wk
1 metric teaspoon per seconds = 302,400 centiliter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/s × 302400 = 18,144,000 cL/wk
60 metric teaspoon per seconds = 18,144,000 centiliter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) | Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/s | 30,240 cL/wk |
| 1 metric tsp/s | 302,400 cL/wk |
| 10 metric tsp/s | 3,024,000 cL/wk |
| 60 metric tsp/s | 18,144,000 cL/wk |
| 100 metric tsp/s | 30,240,000 cL/wk |
| 1,000 metric tsp/s | 302,400,000 cL/wk |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds
1 cL/wk × 0.000003306878307 = 0.0000033069 metric tsp/s
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000033069 metric teaspoon per seconds.
metric teaspoon per seconds = centiliter per weeks × 0.00000330687830688
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per weeks are in 1 metric teaspoon per seconds?
1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 302,400 centiliter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per seconds to centiliter per weeks?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per seconds value by 302400. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks back to metric teaspoon per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0000033069 metric teaspoon per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per seconds?
Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per seconds to centiliter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per seconds and centiliter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 302400 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.