Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Fluid ounce per Weeks Converter — cm3/h to fl oz/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) to Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per hours = 5.680755814 fluid ounce per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Fluid ounce per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 4.88980317e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Fluid ounce per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Hours and Fluid ounce per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per weeks = cubic centimeter per hours × 5.68075581391
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per hours-to-fluid ounce per weeks factor of 5.68075581391.
Simple example
1 cm3/h × 5.680755814 = 5.680755814 fl oz/wk
1 cubic centimeter per hours = 5.680755814 fluid ounce per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/h × 5.680755814 = 340.8453488 fl oz/wk
60 cubic centimeter per hours = 340.8453488 fluid ounce per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) | Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/h | 0.5680755814 fl oz/wk |
| 1 cm3/h | 5.680755814 fl oz/wk |
| 10 cm3/h | 56.80755814 fl oz/wk |
| 60 cm3/h | 340.8453488 fl oz/wk |
| 100 cm3/h | 568.0755814 fl oz/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/h | 5,680.755814 fl oz/wk |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
5.680755814 fl oz/wk × 0.1760329141 = 1 cm3/h
5.680755814 fluid ounce per weeks = 1 cubic centimeter per hours.
cubic centimeter per hours = fluid ounce per weeks × 0.176032914062
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per hours?
1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 5.680755814 fluid ounce per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours to fluid ounce per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per hours value by 5.680755814. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks back to cubic centimeter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 0.1760329141 cubic centimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per hours to fluid ounce per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per hours and fluid ounce per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.680755814 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.