Volumetric flow rate.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours Converter — fl oz/wk to cm3/h
Convert Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.1760329141 cubic centimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Fluid ounce per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.88980317e-11 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Fluid ounce per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
Fluid ounce per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per hours = fluid ounce per weeks × 0.176032914062
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct fluid ounce per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per hours factor of 0.176032914062.
Simple example
1 fl oz/wk × 0.1760329141 = 0.1760329141 cm3/h
1 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.1760329141 cubic centimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 fl oz/wk × 0.1760329141 = 10.56197484 cm3/h
60 fluid ounce per weeks = 10.56197484 cubic centimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 fl oz/wk | 0.0176032914 cm3/h |
| 1 fl oz/wk | 0.1760329141 cm3/h |
| 10 fl oz/wk | 1.760329141 cm3/h |
| 60 fl oz/wk | 10.56197484 cm3/h |
| 100 fl oz/wk | 17.60329141 cm3/h |
| 1,000 fl oz/wk | 176.0329141 cm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Fluid ounce per Weeks
0.1760329141 cm3/h × 5.680755814 = 1 fl oz/wk
0.1760329141 cubic centimeter per hours = 1 fluid ounce per weeks.
fluid ounce per weeks = cubic centimeter per hours × 5.68075581391
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Fluid ounce per Weeks.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per hours are in 1 fluid ounce per weeks?
1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 0.1760329141 cubic centimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks to cubic centimeter per hours?
Multiply the fluid ounce per weeks value by 0.1760329141. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours back to fluid ounce per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 5.680755814 fluid ounce per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the fluid ounce per weeks to cubic centimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both fluid ounce per weeks and cubic centimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1760329141 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.