Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Quart per Weeks Converter — cm3/ms to qt/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) to Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 639,085.0291 quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001 / 1.56473701e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Quart per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond and Quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quart per weeks = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 639085.029065
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, and 1 quart per weeks equals 1.564737e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per millisecond-to-quart per weeks factor of 639085.029065.
Simple example
1 cm3/ms × 639085.0291 = 639,085.0291 qt/wk
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 639,085.0291 quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/ms × 639085.0291 = 38,345,101.74 qt/wk
60 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 38,345,101.74 quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) | Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/ms | 63,908.50291 qt/wk |
| 1 cm3/ms | 639,085.0291 qt/wk |
| 10 cm3/ms | 6,390,850.291 qt/wk |
| 60 cm3/ms | 38,345,101.74 qt/wk |
| 100 cm3/ms | 63,908,502.91 qt/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/ms | 639,085,029.1 qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond
1 qt/wk × 0.000001564737014 = 0.0000015647 cm3/ms
1 quart per weeks = 0.0000015647 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
cubic centimeters per millisecond = quart per weeks × 0.00000156473701389
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Weeks (qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quart per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond?
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 639,085.0291 quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond to quart per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per millisecond value by 639085.0291. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per weeks back to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per weeks equals 0.0000015647 cubic centimeters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per weeks?
Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per millisecond to quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per millisecond and quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 639085.0291 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.