Volumetric flow rate.
Quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — qt/wk to cm3/ms
Convert Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 quart per weeks = 0.0000015647 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.56473701e-9 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Quart per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = quart per weeks × 0.00000156473701389
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 quart per weeks equals 1.564737e-9 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct quart per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 0.00000156473701389.
Simple example
1 qt/wk × 0.000001564737014 = 0.0000015647 cm3/ms
1 quart per weeks = 0.0000015647 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 qt/wk × 0.000001564737014 = 0.0000938842 cm3/ms
60 quart per weeks = 0.0000938842 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 qt/wk | 1.564737e-7 cm3/ms |
| 1 qt/wk | 0.0000015647 cm3/ms |
| 10 qt/wk | 0.0000156474 cm3/ms |
| 60 qt/wk | 0.0000938842 cm3/ms |
| 100 qt/wk | 0.0001564737 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 qt/wk | 0.001564737 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Quart per Weeks
0.0000015647 cm3/ms × 639085.0291 = 0.999976345 qt/wk
0.0000015647 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 0.999976345 quart per weeks.
quart per weeks = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 639085.029065
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Quart per Weeks (qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 quart per weeks?
1 quart per weeks equals 0.0000015647 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert quart per weeks to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the quart per weeks value by 0.000001564737014. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 639,085.0291 quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a quart per weeks?
Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the quart per weeks to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both quart per weeks and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001564737014 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.