Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Seconds Converter — cm3/wk to tsp/s
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 3.354566e-7 teaspoon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 4.92892159e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Seconds
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Teaspoon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
teaspoon per seconds = cubic centimeter per weeks × 3.354566e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 teaspoon per seconds equals 0.00000492892159375 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-teaspoon per seconds factor of 3.354566e-7.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 3.354566e-7 = 3.354566e-7 tsp/s
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 3.354566e-7 teaspoon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 3.354566e-7 = 0.0000201274 tsp/s
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000201274 teaspoon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 3.354566e-8 tsp/s |
| 1 cm3/wk | 3.354566e-7 tsp/s |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0000033546 tsp/s |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0000201274 tsp/s |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0000335457 tsp/s |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0003354566 tsp/s |
Reverse conversion: Teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
3.354566e-7 tsp/s × 2981011.78 = 1.000000076 cm3/wk
3.354566e-7 teaspoon per seconds = 1.000000076 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = teaspoon per seconds × 2981011.7799
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many teaspoon per seconds are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 3.354566e-7 teaspoon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to teaspoon per seconds?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 3.354566e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert teaspoon per seconds back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 teaspoon per seconds equals 2,981,011.78 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a teaspoon per seconds?
Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to teaspoon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and teaspoon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.354566e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.