Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks Converter — tsp/s to cm3/wk
Convert Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s) to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per seconds = 2,981,011.78 cubic centimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.92892159e-6 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
Teaspoon per Seconds and Cubic Centimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per weeks = teaspoon per seconds × 2981011.7799
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per seconds equals 0.00000492892159375 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per seconds-to-cubic centimeter per weeks factor of 2981011.7799.
Simple example
1 tsp/s × 2981011.78 = 2,981,011.78 cm3/wk
1 teaspoon per seconds = 2,981,011.78 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 tsp/s × 2981011.78 = 178,860,706.8 cm3/wk
60 teaspoon per seconds = 178,860,706.8 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s) | Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/s | 298,101.178 cm3/wk |
| 1 tsp/s | 2,981,011.78 cm3/wk |
| 10 tsp/s | 29,810,117.8 cm3/wk |
| 60 tsp/s | 178,860,706.8 cm3/wk |
| 100 tsp/s | 298,101,178 cm3/wk |
| 1,000 tsp/s | 2,981,011,780 cm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Seconds
1 cm3/wk × 3.354566e-7 = 3.354566e-7 tsp/s
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 3.354566e-7 teaspoon per seconds.
teaspoon per seconds = cubic centimeter per weeks × 3.354566e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Seconds.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per weeks are in 1 teaspoon per seconds?
1 teaspoon per seconds equals 2,981,011.78 cubic centimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per seconds to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Multiply the teaspoon per seconds value by 2981011.78. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks back to teaspoon per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 3.354566e-7 teaspoon per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per seconds?
Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per seconds to cubic centimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per seconds and cubic centimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2981011.78 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.