Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Weeks Converter — ft3/fn to m3/wk
Convert Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) to Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0141584233 cubic meter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.34100914e-8 / 1.65343915e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Weeks
Cubic foot per Fortnight and Cubic Meter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meter per weeks = cubic feet per fortnight × 0.014158423296
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 2.341009e-8 base units, and 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per fortnight-to-cubic meter per weeks factor of 0.014158423296.
Simple example
1 ft3/fn × 0.0141584233 = 0.0141584233 m3/wk
1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0141584233 cubic meter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 ft3/fn × 0.0141584233 = 0.8495053978 m3/wk
60 cubic feet per fortnight = 0.8495053978 cubic meter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) | Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/fn | 0.0014158423 m3/wk |
| 1 ft3/fn | 0.0141584233 m3/wk |
| 10 ft3/fn | 0.141584233 m3/wk |
| 60 ft3/fn | 0.8495053978 m3/wk |
| 100 ft3/fn | 1.41584233 m3/wk |
| 1,000 ft3/fn | 14.1584233 m3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic foot per Fortnight
0.0141584233 m3/wk × 70.62933344 = 1 ft3/fn
0.0141584233 cubic meter per weeks = 1 cubic feet per fortnight.
cubic feet per fortnight = cubic meter per weeks × 70.629333443
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic foot per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meter per weeks are in 1 cubic foot per fortnight?
1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 0.0141584233 cubic meter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per fortnight to cubic meter per weeks?
Multiply the cubic foot per fortnight value by 0.0141584233. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks back to cubic foot per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 70.62933344 cubic feet per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per fortnight?
Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per fortnight to cubic meter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per fortnight and cubic meter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0141584233 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.