Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Fortnight Converter — m3/wk to ft3/fn
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 70.62933344 cubic foot per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 2.34100914e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Fortnight
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Cubic foot per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per fortnight = cubic meter per weeks × 70.629333443
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 2.341009e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-cubic foot per fortnight factor of 70.629333443.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 70.62933344 = 70.62933344 ft3/fn
1 cubic meter per weeks = 70.62933344 cubic feet per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 70.62933344 = 4,237.760007 ft3/fn
60 cubic meter per weeks = 4,237.760007 cubic feet per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 7.062933344 ft3/fn |
| 1 m3/wk | 70.62933344 ft3/fn |
| 10 m3/wk | 706.2933344 ft3/fn |
| 60 m3/wk | 4,237.760007 ft3/fn |
| 100 m3/wk | 7,062.933344 ft3/fn |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 70,629.33344 ft3/fn |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Weeks
70.62933344 ft3/fn × 0.0141584233 = 1 m3/wk
70.62933344 cubic feet per fortnight = 1 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = cubic feet per fortnight × 0.014158423296
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per fortnight are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 70.62933344 cubic feet per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to cubic foot per fortnight?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 70.62933344. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per fortnight back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 0.0141584233 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per fortnight?
Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to cubic foot per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and cubic foot per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 70.62933344 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.