Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Hours to Deciliters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/h to dL/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) to Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per hours = 0.0000786579 deciliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Hours to Deciliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.86579072e-6 / 0.1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Hours to Deciliters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Hours and Deciliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
deciliters per millisecond = cubic foot per hours × 0.0000786579072
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, and 1 deciliter per millisecond equals 0.1 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per hours-to-deciliter per millisecond factor of 0.0000786579072.
Simple example
1 ft3/h × 0.0000786579072 = 0.0000786579 dL/ms
1 cubic foot per hours = 0.0000786579 deciliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/h × 0.0000786579072 = 0.0047194744 dL/ms
60 cubic foot per hours = 0.0047194744 deciliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) | Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/h | 0.0000078658 dL/ms |
| 1 ft3/h | 0.0000786579 dL/ms |
| 10 ft3/h | 0.0007865791 dL/ms |
| 60 ft3/h | 0.0047194744 dL/ms |
| 100 ft3/h | 0.0078657907 dL/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/h | 0.0786579072 dL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Deciliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours
0.0000786579 dL/ms × 12713.28002 = 0.9999999085 ft3/h
0.0000786579 deciliters per millisecond = 0.9999999085 cubic foot per hours.
cubic foot per hours = deciliters per millisecond × 12713.2800197
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Deciliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many deciliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per hours?
1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.0000786579 deciliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours to deciliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per hours value by 0.0000786579072. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert deciliter per millisecond back to cubic foot per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 deciliter per millisecond equals 12,713.28002 cubic foot per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a deciliter per millisecond?
Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per hours to deciliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per hours and deciliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0000786579072 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.