Volumetric flow rate.
Deciliters per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours Converter — dL/ms to ft3/h
Convert Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) to Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 deciliter per millisecond = 12,713.28002 cubic foot per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Deciliters per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.1 / 7.86579072e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Deciliters per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours
Deciliter per Millisecond and Cubic foot per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per hours = deciliters per millisecond × 12713.2800197
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 deciliter per millisecond equals 0.1 base units, and 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct deciliter per millisecond-to-cubic foot per hours factor of 12713.2800197.
Simple example
1 dL/ms × 12713.28002 = 12,713.28002 ft3/h
1 deciliter per millisecond = 12,713.28002 cubic foot per hours.
Real-world example
60 dL/ms × 12713.28002 = 762,796.8012 ft3/h
60 deciliters per millisecond = 762,796.8012 cubic foot per hours.
Conversion table
| Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) | Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 dL/ms | 1,271.328002 ft3/h |
| 1 dL/ms | 12,713.28002 ft3/h |
| 10 dL/ms | 127,132.8002 ft3/h |
| 60 dL/ms | 762,796.8012 ft3/h |
| 100 dL/ms | 1,271,328.002 ft3/h |
| 1,000 dL/ms | 12,713,280.02 ft3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Hours to Deciliter per Millisecond
1 ft3/h × 0.0000786579072 = 0.0000786579 dL/ms
1 cubic foot per hours = 0.0000786579 deciliters per millisecond.
deciliters per millisecond = cubic foot per hours × 0.0000786579072
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Hours to Deciliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per hours are in 1 deciliter per millisecond?
1 deciliter per millisecond equals 12,713.28002 cubic foot per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert deciliter per millisecond to cubic foot per hours?
Multiply the deciliter per millisecond value by 12713.28002. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours back to deciliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.0000786579 deciliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a deciliter per millisecond?
Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the deciliter per millisecond to cubic foot per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both deciliter per millisecond and cubic foot per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 12713.28002 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.