Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Liters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/ms to L/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) to Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per millisecond = 28.31684659 liter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Liters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 28.31684659 / 1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Millisecond to Liters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Millisecond and Liter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
liters per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 28.316846592
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, and 1 liter per millisecond equals 1 base unit, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per millisecond-to-liter per millisecond factor of 28.316846592.
Simple example
1 ft3/ms × 28.31684659 = 28.31684659 L/ms
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 28.31684659 liters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/ms × 28.31684659 = 1,699.010796 L/ms
60 cubic feet per millisecond = 1,699.010796 liters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) | Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/ms | 2.831684659 L/ms |
| 1 ft3/ms | 28.31684659 L/ms |
| 10 ft3/ms | 283.1684659 L/ms |
| 60 ft3/ms | 1,699.010796 L/ms |
| 100 ft3/ms | 2,831.684659 L/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/ms | 28,316.84659 L/ms |
Reverse conversion: Liter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond
28.31684659 L/ms × 0.03531466672 = 0.9999999999 ft3/ms
28.31684659 liters per millisecond = 0.9999999999 cubic feet per millisecond.
cubic feet per millisecond = liters per millisecond × 0.0353146667215
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Liter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Liter per Millisecond (L/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many liters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per millisecond?
1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.31684659 liters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond to liter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per millisecond value by 28.31684659. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert liter per millisecond back to cubic foot per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 liter per millisecond equals 0.0353146667 cubic feet per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a liter per millisecond?
Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per millisecond to liter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per millisecond and liter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 28.31684659 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.