Volumetric flow rate.
Liters per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — L/ms to ft3/ms
Convert Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per millisecond = 0.0353146667 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liters per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liters per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Liter per Millisecond and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = liters per millisecond × 0.0353146667215
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per millisecond equals 1 base unit, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per millisecond-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 0.0353146667215.
Simple example
1 L/ms × 0.03531466672 = 0.0353146667 ft3/ms
1 liter per millisecond = 0.0353146667 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 L/ms × 0.03531466672 = 2.118880003 ft3/ms
60 liters per millisecond = 2.118880003 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/ms | 0.0035314667 ft3/ms |
| 1 L/ms | 0.0353146667 ft3/ms |
| 10 L/ms | 0.3531466672 ft3/ms |
| 60 L/ms | 2.118880003 ft3/ms |
| 100 L/ms | 3.531466672 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 L/ms | 35.31466672 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Liter per Millisecond
0.0353146667 ft3/ms × 28.31684659 = 0.9999999994 L/ms
0.0353146667 cubic feet per millisecond = 0.9999999994 liters per millisecond.
liters per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 28.316846592
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Liter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Liter per Millisecond (L/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 liter per millisecond?
1 liter per millisecond equals 0.0353146667 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the liter per millisecond value by 0.03531466672. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to liter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.31684659 liters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per millisecond?
Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per millisecond and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.03531466672 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.