Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds Converter — ft3/wk to imp gal/s
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.000010299 imperial gallon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 0.00454609.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds
Cubic foot per Weeks and Imperial gallon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial gallon per seconds = cubic foot per weeks × 0.0000102990004283
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 imperial gallon per seconds equals 0.00454609 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-imperial gallon per seconds factor of 0.0000102990004283.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.00001029900043 = 0.000010299 imp gal/s
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.000010299 imperial gallon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.00001029900043 = 0.00061794 imp gal/s
60 cubic foot per weeks = 0.00061794 imperial gallon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.0000010299 imp gal/s |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.000010299 imp gal/s |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.00010299 imp gal/s |
| 60 ft3/wk | 0.00061794 imp gal/s |
| 100 ft3/wk | 0.0010299 imp gal/s |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 0.0102990004 imp gal/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial gallon per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.000010299 imp gal/s × 97096.80148 = 0.9999999584 ft3/wk
0.000010299 imperial gallon per seconds = 0.9999999584 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = imperial gallon per seconds × 97096.8014771
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial gallon per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial gallon per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.000010299 imperial gallon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to imperial gallon per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.00001029900043. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial gallon per seconds back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial gallon per seconds equals 97,096.80148 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial gallon per seconds?
Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to imperial gallon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and imperial gallon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001029900043 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.