Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial gallon per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks Converter — imp gal/s to ft3/wk
Convert Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) to Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial gallon per seconds = 97,096.80148 cubic foot per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial gallon per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.00454609 / 4.68201829e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial gallon per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks
Imperial gallon per Seconds and Cubic foot per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per weeks = imperial gallon per seconds × 97096.8014771
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial gallon per seconds equals 0.00454609 base units, and 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial gallon per seconds-to-cubic foot per weeks factor of 97096.8014771.
Simple example
1 imp gal/s × 97096.80148 = 97,096.80148 ft3/wk
1 imperial gallon per seconds = 97,096.80148 cubic foot per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp gal/s × 97096.80148 = 5,825,808.089 ft3/wk
60 imperial gallon per seconds = 5,825,808.089 cubic foot per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) | Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp gal/s | 9,709.680148 ft3/wk |
| 1 imp gal/s | 97,096.80148 ft3/wk |
| 10 imp gal/s | 970,968.0148 ft3/wk |
| 60 imp gal/s | 5,825,808.089 ft3/wk |
| 100 imp gal/s | 9,709,680.148 ft3/wk |
| 1,000 imp gal/s | 97,096,801.48 ft3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds
1 ft3/wk × 0.00001029900043 = 0.000010299 imp gal/s
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.000010299 imperial gallon per seconds.
imperial gallon per seconds = cubic foot per weeks × 0.0000102990004283
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per weeks are in 1 imperial gallon per seconds?
1 imperial gallon per seconds equals 97,096.80148 cubic foot per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial gallon per seconds to cubic foot per weeks?
Multiply the imperial gallon per seconds value by 97096.80148. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks back to imperial gallon per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.000010299 imperial gallon per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial gallon per seconds?
Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial gallon per seconds to cubic foot per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial gallon per seconds and cubic foot per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 97096.80148 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.