Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Days to Metric teaspoon per Weeks Converter — m3/d to metric tsp/wk
Convert Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) to Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per days = 1,400,000 metric teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Days to Metric teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-5 / 8.26719577e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Days to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
Cubic Meter per Days and Metric teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per weeks = cubic meter per days × 1400000
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per days equals 0.0000115740740741 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per days-to-metric teaspoon per weeks factor of 1400000.
Simple example
1 m3/d × 1400000 = 1,400,000 metric tsp/wk
1 cubic meter per days = 1,400,000 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 m3/d × 1400000 = 84,000,000 metric tsp/wk
60 cubic meter per days = 84,000,000 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) | Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/d | 140,000 metric tsp/wk |
| 1 m3/d | 1,400,000 metric tsp/wk |
| 10 m3/d | 14,000,000 metric tsp/wk |
| 60 m3/d | 84,000,000 metric tsp/wk |
| 100 m3/d | 140,000,000 metric tsp/wk |
| 1,000 m3/d | 1,400,000,000 metric tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Days
1 metric tsp/wk × 7.142857e-7 = 7.142857e-7 m3/d
1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 7.142857e-7 cubic meter per days.
cubic meter per days = metric teaspoon per weeks × 7.142857e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per weeks are in 1 cubic meter per days?
1 cubic meter per days equals 1,400,000 metric teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per days to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the cubic meter per days value by 1400000. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks back to cubic meter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 7.142857e-7 cubic meter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per days?
Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per days to metric teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per days and metric teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1400000 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.