Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Days Converter — metric tsp/wk to m3/d
Convert Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) to Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 7.142857e-7 cubic meter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 1.15740741e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Days
Metric teaspoon per Weeks and Cubic Meter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meter per days = metric teaspoon per weeks × 7.142857e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 cubic meter per days equals 0.0000115740740741 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per weeks-to-cubic meter per days factor of 7.142857e-7.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/wk × 7.142857e-7 = 7.142857e-7 m3/d
1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 7.142857e-7 cubic meter per days.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/wk × 7.142857e-7 = 0.0000428571 m3/d
60 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0000428571 cubic meter per days.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) | Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/wk | 7.142857e-8 m3/d |
| 1 metric tsp/wk | 7.142857e-7 m3/d |
| 10 metric tsp/wk | 0.0000071429 m3/d |
| 60 metric tsp/wk | 0.0000428571 m3/d |
| 100 metric tsp/wk | 0.0000714286 m3/d |
| 1,000 metric tsp/wk | 0.0007142857 m3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Days to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
7.142857e-7 m3/d × 1400000 = 0.99999998 metric tsp/wk
7.142857e-7 cubic meter per days = 0.99999998 metric teaspoon per weeks.
metric teaspoon per weeks = cubic meter per days × 1400000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Days to Metric teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meter per days are in 1 metric teaspoon per weeks?
1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 7.142857e-7 cubic meter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks to cubic meter per days?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per weeks value by 7.142857e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per days back to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per days equals 1,400,000 metric teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per days?
Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per weeks to cubic meter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per weeks and cubic meter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 7.142857e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.