Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — m3/wk to imp qt/h
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 5.237363055 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = cubic meter per weeks × 5.23736305474
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 5.23736305474.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 5.237363055 = 5.237363055 imp qt/h
1 cubic meter per weeks = 5.237363055 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 5.237363055 = 314.2417833 imp qt/h
60 cubic meter per weeks = 314.2417833 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 0.5237363055 imp qt/h |
| 1 m3/wk | 5.237363055 imp qt/h |
| 10 m3/wk | 52.37363055 imp qt/h |
| 60 m3/wk | 314.2417833 imp qt/h |
| 100 m3/wk | 523.7363055 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 5,237.363055 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Meter per Weeks
5.237363055 imp qt/h × 0.19093578 = 1 m3/wk
5.237363055 imperial quart per hours = 1 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = imperial quart per hours × 0.19093578
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 5.237363055 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 5.237363055. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 0.19093578 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.237363055 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.