Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Meter per Weeks Converter — imp qt/h to m3/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) to Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per hours = 0.19093578 cubic meter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Meter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.15700694e-7 / 1.65343915e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Meter per Weeks
Imperial quart per Hours and Cubic Meter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meter per weeks = imperial quart per hours × 0.19093578
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, and 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per hours-to-cubic meter per weeks factor of 0.19093578.
Simple example
1 imp qt/h × 0.19093578 = 0.19093578 m3/wk
1 imperial quart per hours = 0.19093578 cubic meter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/h × 0.19093578 = 11.4561468 m3/wk
60 imperial quart per hours = 11.4561468 cubic meter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) | Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/h | 0.019093578 m3/wk |
| 1 imp qt/h | 0.19093578 m3/wk |
| 10 imp qt/h | 1.9093578 m3/wk |
| 60 imp qt/h | 11.4561468 m3/wk |
| 100 imp qt/h | 19.093578 m3/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/h | 190.93578 m3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours
0.19093578 m3/wk × 5.237363055 = 1 imp qt/h
0.19093578 cubic meter per weeks = 1 imperial quart per hours.
imperial quart per hours = cubic meter per weeks × 5.23736305474
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meter per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per hours?
1 imperial quart per hours equals 0.19093578 cubic meter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours to cubic meter per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per hours value by 0.19093578. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks back to imperial quart per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 5.237363055 imperial quart per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per hours to cubic meter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per hours and cubic meter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.19093578 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.