Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds Converter — m3/wk to imp qt/s
Convert Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) to Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0014548231 imperial quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-6 / 0.0011365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds
Cubic Meter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per seconds = cubic meter per weeks × 0.00145482307076
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, and 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per weeks-to-imperial quart per seconds factor of 0.00145482307076.
Simple example
1 m3/wk × 0.001454823071 = 0.0014548231 imp qt/s
1 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0014548231 imperial quart per seconds.
Real-world example
60 m3/wk × 0.001454823071 = 0.0872893843 imp qt/s
60 cubic meter per weeks = 0.0872893843 imperial quart per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) | Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/wk | 0.0001454823 imp qt/s |
| 1 m3/wk | 0.0014548231 imp qt/s |
| 10 m3/wk | 0.0145482307 imp qt/s |
| 60 m3/wk | 0.0872893843 imp qt/s |
| 100 m3/wk | 0.1454823071 imp qt/s |
| 1,000 m3/wk | 1.454823071 imp qt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks
0.0014548231 imp qt/s × 687.368808 = 1.00000002 m3/wk
0.0014548231 imperial quart per seconds = 1.00000002 cubic meter per weeks.
cubic meter per weeks = imperial quart per seconds × 687.368808
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per seconds are in 1 cubic meter per weeks?
1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.0014548231 imperial quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks to imperial quart per seconds?
Multiply the cubic meter per weeks value by 0.001454823071. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds back to cubic meter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 687.368808 cubic meter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per weeks to imperial quart per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per weeks and imperial quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001454823071 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.