Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks Converter — imp qt/s to m3/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 687.368808 cubic meter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 1.65343915e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Weeks
Imperial quart per Seconds and Cubic Meter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meter per weeks = imperial quart per seconds × 687.368808
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-cubic meter per weeks factor of 687.368808.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 687.368808 = 687.368808 m3/wk
1 imperial quart per seconds = 687.368808 cubic meter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 687.368808 = 41,242.12848 m3/wk
60 imperial quart per seconds = 41,242.12848 cubic meter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 68.7368808 m3/wk |
| 1 imp qt/s | 687.368808 m3/wk |
| 10 imp qt/s | 6,873.68808 m3/wk |
| 60 imp qt/s | 41,242.12848 m3/wk |
| 100 imp qt/s | 68,736.8808 m3/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 687,368.808 m3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds
687.368808 m3/wk × 0.001454823071 = 1 imp qt/s
687.368808 cubic meter per weeks = 1 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = cubic meter per weeks × 0.00145482307076
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meter per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 687.368808 cubic meter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to cubic meter per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 687.368808. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.0014548231 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to cubic meter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and cubic meter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 687.368808 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.