Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight to Pints per Millisecond Converter — mm3/fn to pt/ms
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) to Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per fortnight = 1.74717e-15 pint per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight to Pints per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-16 / 0.473176473.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight to Pints per Millisecond
Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight and Pint per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
pints per millisecond = cubic millimeters per fortnight × 1.74717e-15
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-16 base units, and 1 pint per millisecond equals 0.473176473 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per fortnight-to-pint per millisecond factor of 1.74717e-15.
Simple example
1 mm3/fn × 1.74717e-15 = 1.74717e-15 pt/ms
1 cubic millimeter per fortnight = 1.74717e-15 pints per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mm3/fn × 1.74717e-15 = 1.048302e-13 pt/ms
60 cubic millimeters per fortnight = 1.048302e-13 pints per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) | Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/fn | 1.74717e-16 pt/ms |
| 1 mm3/fn | 1.74717e-15 pt/ms |
| 10 mm3/fn | 1.74717e-14 pt/ms |
| 60 mm3/fn | 1.048302e-13 pt/ms |
| 100 mm3/fn | 1.74717e-13 pt/ms |
| 1,000 mm3/fn | 1.74717e-12 pt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Pint per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight
1.74717e-15 pt/ms × 5.723543e+14 = 1.000000195 mm3/fn
1.74717e-15 pints per millisecond = 1.000000195 cubic millimeters per fortnight.
cubic millimeters per fortnight = pints per millisecond × 5.723543e+14
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Pint per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many pints per millisecond are in 1 cubic millimeter per fortnight?
1 cubic millimeter per fortnight equals 1.74717e-15 pints per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per fortnight to pint per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per fortnight value by 1.74717e-15. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert pint per millisecond back to cubic millimeter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 pint per millisecond equals 5.723543e+14 cubic millimeters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a pint per millisecond?
Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per fortnight to pint per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per fortnight and pint per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.74717e-15 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.