Volumetric flow rate.
Pints per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight Converter — pt/ms to mm3/fn
Convert Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) to Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 pint per millisecond = 5.723543e+14 cubic millimeter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Pints per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.473176473 / 8.26719577e-16.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Pints per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight
Pint per Millisecond and Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per fortnight = pints per millisecond × 5.723543e+14
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 pint per millisecond equals 0.473176473 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-16 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct pint per millisecond-to-cubic millimeter per fortnight factor of 5.723543e+14.
Simple example
1 pt/ms × 5.723543e+14 = 5.723543e+14 mm3/fn
1 pint per millisecond = 5.723543e+14 cubic millimeters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 pt/ms × 5.723543e+14 = 3.434126e+16 mm3/fn
60 pints per millisecond = 3.434126e+16 cubic millimeters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) | Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 pt/ms | 5.723543e+13 mm3/fn |
| 1 pt/ms | 5.723543e+14 mm3/fn |
| 10 pt/ms | 5.723543e+15 mm3/fn |
| 60 pt/ms | 3.434126e+16 mm3/fn |
| 100 pt/ms | 5.723543e+16 mm3/fn |
| 1,000 pt/ms | 5.723543e+17 mm3/fn |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight to Pint per Millisecond
5.723543e+14 mm3/fn × 1.74717e-15 = 1.000000067 pt/ms
5.723543e+14 cubic millimeters per fortnight = 1.000000067 pints per millisecond.
pints per millisecond = cubic millimeters per fortnight × 1.74717e-15
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight to Pint per Millisecond.
Understanding the Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per fortnight are in 1 pint per millisecond?
1 pint per millisecond equals 5.723543e+14 cubic millimeters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert pint per millisecond to cubic millimeter per fortnight?
Multiply the pint per millisecond value by 5.723543e+14. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per fortnight back to pint per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per fortnight equals 1.74717e-15 pints per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a pint per millisecond?
Pint per Millisecond (pt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the pint per millisecond to cubic millimeter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both pint per millisecond and cubic millimeter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.723543e+14 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.