Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Metric cup per Weeks Converter — mm3/h to metric cup/wk
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) to Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per hours = 0.000672 metric cup per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Metric cup per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-13 / 4.13359788e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Metric cup per Weeks
Cubic Millimeter per Hours and Metric cup per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric cup per weeks = cubic millimeter per hours × 0.000672
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, and 1 metric cup per weeks equals 4.133598e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per hours-to-metric cup per weeks factor of 0.000672.
Simple example
1 mm3/h × 0.000672 = 0.000672 metric cup/wk
1 cubic millimeter per hours = 0.000672 metric cup per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mm3/h × 0.000672 = 0.04032 metric cup/wk
60 cubic millimeter per hours = 0.04032 metric cup per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) | Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/h | 0.0000672 metric cup/wk |
| 1 mm3/h | 0.000672 metric cup/wk |
| 10 mm3/h | 0.00672 metric cup/wk |
| 60 mm3/h | 0.04032 metric cup/wk |
| 100 mm3/h | 0.0672 metric cup/wk |
| 1,000 mm3/h | 0.672 metric cup/wk |
Reverse conversion: Metric cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours
0.000672 metric cup/wk × 1488.095238 = 1 mm3/h
0.000672 metric cup per weeks = 1 cubic millimeter per hours.
cubic millimeter per hours = metric cup per weeks × 1488.0952381
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric cup per weeks are in 1 cubic millimeter per hours?
1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 0.000672 metric cup per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per hours to metric cup per weeks?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per hours value by 0.000672. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric cup per weeks back to cubic millimeter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric cup per weeks equals 1,488.095238 cubic millimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per hours?
Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric cup per weeks?
Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per hours to metric cup per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per hours and metric cup per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000672 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.