Volumetric flow rate.
Metric cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours Converter — metric cup/wk to mm3/h
Convert Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric cup per weeks = 1,488.095238 cubic millimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.13359788e-10 / 2.77777778e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric cup per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours
Metric cup per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per hours = metric cup per weeks × 1488.0952381
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric cup per weeks equals 4.133598e-10 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric cup per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per hours factor of 1488.0952381.
Simple example
1 metric cup/wk × 1488.095238 = 1,488.095238 mm3/h
1 metric cup per weeks = 1,488.095238 cubic millimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 metric cup/wk × 1488.095238 = 89,285.71429 mm3/h
60 metric cup per weeks = 89,285.71429 cubic millimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric cup/wk | 148.8095238 mm3/h |
| 1 metric cup/wk | 1,488.095238 mm3/h |
| 10 metric cup/wk | 14,880.95238 mm3/h |
| 60 metric cup/wk | 89,285.71429 mm3/h |
| 100 metric cup/wk | 148,809.5238 mm3/h |
| 1,000 metric cup/wk | 1,488,095.238 mm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Metric cup per Weeks
1 mm3/h × 0.000672 = 0.000672 metric cup/wk
1 cubic millimeter per hours = 0.000672 metric cup per weeks.
metric cup per weeks = cubic millimeter per hours × 0.000672
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Metric cup per Weeks.
Understanding the Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per hours are in 1 metric cup per weeks?
1 metric cup per weeks equals 1,488.095238 cubic millimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric cup per weeks to cubic millimeter per hours?
Multiply the metric cup per weeks value by 1488.095238. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per hours back to metric cup per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 0.000672 metric cup per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric cup per weeks?
Metric cup per Weeks (metric cup/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per hours?
Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric cup per weeks to cubic millimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric cup per weeks and cubic millimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1488.095238 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.