Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — hL/s to imp qt/h
Convert Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per seconds = 316,755.7176 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.1 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours
Hectoliter per Seconds and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = hectoliter per seconds × 316755.717551
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.1 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per seconds-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 316755.717551.
Simple example
1 hL/s × 316755.7176 = 316,755.7176 imp qt/h
1 hectoliter per seconds = 316,755.7176 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 hL/s × 316755.7176 = 19,005,343.05 imp qt/h
60 hectoliter per seconds = 19,005,343.05 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/s | 31,675.57176 imp qt/h |
| 1 hL/s | 316,755.7176 imp qt/h |
| 10 hL/s | 3,167,557.176 imp qt/h |
| 60 hL/s | 19,005,343.05 imp qt/h |
| 100 hL/s | 31,675,571.76 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 hL/s | 316,755,717.6 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Hectoliter per Seconds
1 imp qt/h × 0.000003157006944 = 0.000003157 hL/s
1 imperial quart per hours = 0.000003157 hectoliter per seconds.
hectoliter per seconds = imperial quart per hours × 0.00000315700694444
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Hectoliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 hectoliter per seconds?
1 hectoliter per seconds equals 316,755.7176 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per seconds to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the hectoliter per seconds value by 316755.7176. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to hectoliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 0.000003157 hectoliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per seconds?
Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per seconds to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per seconds and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 316755.7176 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.