Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Hours to Hectoliter per Seconds Converter — imp qt/h to hL/s
Convert Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) to Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per hours = 0.000003157 hectoliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Hours to Hectoliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.15700694e-7 / 0.1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Hours to Hectoliter per Seconds
Imperial quart per Hours and Hectoliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
hectoliter per seconds = imperial quart per hours × 0.00000315700694444
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, and 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.1 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per hours-to-hectoliter per seconds factor of 0.00000315700694444.
Simple example
1 imp qt/h × 0.000003157006944 = 0.000003157 hL/s
1 imperial quart per hours = 0.000003157 hectoliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/h × 0.000003157006944 = 0.0001894204 hL/s
60 imperial quart per hours = 0.0001894204 hectoliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) | Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/h | 3.157007e-7 hL/s |
| 1 imp qt/h | 0.000003157 hL/s |
| 10 imp qt/h | 0.0000315701 hL/s |
| 60 imp qt/h | 0.0001894204 hL/s |
| 100 imp qt/h | 0.0003157007 hL/s |
| 1,000 imp qt/h | 0.0031570069 hL/s |
Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours
0.000003157 hL/s × 316755.7176 = 0.9999978003 imp qt/h
0.000003157 hectoliter per seconds = 0.9999978003 imperial quart per hours.
imperial quart per hours = hectoliter per seconds × 316755.717551
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many hectoliter per seconds are in 1 imperial quart per hours?
1 imperial quart per hours equals 0.000003157 hectoliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours to hectoliter per seconds?
Multiply the imperial quart per hours value by 0.000003157006944. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert hectoliter per seconds back to imperial quart per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 316,755.7176 imperial quart per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a hectoliter per seconds?
Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per hours to hectoliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per hours and hectoliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003157006944 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.