Volumetric flow rate.
Liters per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Seconds Converter — L/fn to imp qt/s
Convert Liter per Fortnight (L/fn) to Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 liter per fortnight = 7.274115e-7 imperial quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Liters per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-10 / 0.0011365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Liters per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Seconds
Liter per Fortnight and Imperial quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per seconds = liters per fortnight × 7.274115e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 liter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-10 base units, and 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct liter per fortnight-to-imperial quart per seconds factor of 7.274115e-7.
Simple example
1 L/fn × 7.274115e-7 = 7.274115e-7 imp qt/s
1 liter per fortnight = 7.274115e-7 imperial quart per seconds.
Real-world example
60 L/fn × 7.274115e-7 = 0.0000436447 imp qt/s
60 liters per fortnight = 0.0000436447 imperial quart per seconds.
Conversion table
| Liter per Fortnight (L/fn) | Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 L/fn | 7.274115e-8 imp qt/s |
| 1 L/fn | 7.274115e-7 imp qt/s |
| 10 L/fn | 0.0000072741 imp qt/s |
| 60 L/fn | 0.0000436447 imp qt/s |
| 100 L/fn | 0.0000727412 imp qt/s |
| 1,000 L/fn | 0.0007274115 imp qt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Seconds to Liter per Fortnight
7.274115e-7 imp qt/s × 1374737.616 = 0.9999999514 L/fn
7.274115e-7 imperial quart per seconds = 0.9999999514 liters per fortnight.
liters per fortnight = imperial quart per seconds × 1374737.616
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Seconds to Liter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Liter per Fortnight (L/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per seconds are in 1 liter per fortnight?
1 liter per fortnight equals 7.274115e-7 imperial quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert liter per fortnight to imperial quart per seconds?
Multiply the liter per fortnight value by 7.274115e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds back to liter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 1,374,737.616 liters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a liter per fortnight?
Liter per Fortnight (L/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the liter per fortnight to imperial quart per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both liter per fortnight and imperial quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 7.274115e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.