Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Liters per Fortnight Converter — imp qt/s to L/fn
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Liter per Fortnight (L/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 1,374,737.616 liter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Liters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 8.26719577e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Liters per Fortnight
Imperial quart per Seconds and Liter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
liters per fortnight = imperial quart per seconds × 1374737.616
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 liter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-liter per fortnight factor of 1374737.616.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 1374737.616 = 1,374,737.616 L/fn
1 imperial quart per seconds = 1,374,737.616 liters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 1374737.616 = 82,484,256.96 L/fn
60 imperial quart per seconds = 82,484,256.96 liters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Liter per Fortnight (L/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 137,473.7616 L/fn |
| 1 imp qt/s | 1,374,737.616 L/fn |
| 10 imp qt/s | 13,747,376.16 L/fn |
| 60 imp qt/s | 82,484,256.96 L/fn |
| 100 imp qt/s | 137,473,761.6 L/fn |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 1,374,737,616 L/fn |
Reverse conversion: Liter per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Seconds
1 L/fn × 7.274115e-7 = 7.274115e-7 imp qt/s
1 liter per fortnight = 7.274115e-7 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = liters per fortnight × 7.274115e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Liter per Fortnight to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Liter per Fortnight (L/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many liters per fortnight are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 1,374,737.616 liters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to liter per fortnight?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 1374737.616. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert liter per fortnight back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 liter per fortnight equals 7.274115e-7 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a liter per fortnight?
Liter per Fortnight (L/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to liter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and liter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1374737.616 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.