Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoons per Fortnight Converter — mL/wk to metric tsp/fn
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.4 metric teaspoon per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoons per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 4.13359788e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoons per Fortnight
Milliliter per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoons per fortnight = milliliter per weeks × 0.4
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per fortnight equals 4.133598e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per fortnight factor of 0.4.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 0.4 = 0.4 metric tsp/fn
1 milliliter per weeks = 0.4 metric teaspoons per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 0.4 = 24 metric tsp/fn
60 milliliter per weeks = 24 metric teaspoons per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 0.04 metric tsp/fn |
| 1 mL/wk | 0.4 metric tsp/fn |
| 10 mL/wk | 4 metric tsp/fn |
| 60 mL/wk | 24 metric tsp/fn |
| 100 mL/wk | 40 metric tsp/fn |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 400 metric tsp/fn |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks
0.4 metric tsp/fn × 2.5 = 1 mL/wk
0.4 metric teaspoons per fortnight = 1 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = metric teaspoons per fortnight × 2.5
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoons per fortnight are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.4 metric teaspoons per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per fortnight?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.4. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per fortnight back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per fortnight equals 2.5 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per fortnight?
Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and metric teaspoon per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.4 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.