Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoons per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks Converter — metric tsp/fn to mL/wk
Convert Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) to Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per fortnight = 2.5 milliliter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoons per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.13359788e-12 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoons per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks
Metric teaspoon per Fortnight and Milliliter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per weeks = metric teaspoons per fortnight × 2.5
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per fortnight equals 4.133598e-12 base units, and 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per fortnight-to-milliliter per weeks factor of 2.5.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/fn × 2.5 = 2.5 mL/wk
1 metric teaspoon per fortnight = 2.5 milliliter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/fn × 2.5 = 150 mL/wk
60 metric teaspoons per fortnight = 150 milliliter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) | Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/fn | 0.25 mL/wk |
| 1 metric tsp/fn | 2.5 mL/wk |
| 10 metric tsp/fn | 25 mL/wk |
| 60 metric tsp/fn | 150 mL/wk |
| 100 metric tsp/fn | 250 mL/wk |
| 1,000 metric tsp/fn | 2,500 mL/wk |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Fortnight
2.5 mL/wk × 0.4 = 1 metric tsp/fn
2.5 milliliter per weeks = 1 metric teaspoon per fortnight.
metric teaspoons per fortnight = milliliter per weeks × 0.4
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Fortnight.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per weeks are in 1 metric teaspoon per fortnight?
1 metric teaspoon per fortnight equals 2.5 milliliter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per fortnight to milliliter per weeks?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per fortnight value by 2.5. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks back to metric teaspoon per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.4 metric teaspoons per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per fortnight?
Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per fortnight to milliliter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per fortnight and milliliter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.5 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.